Print Friendly Version: Section ||| Chapter ||| Book

Appendix 3: Defence Procurement22

There should be little difference between public expenditure management in general and public expenditure management in the defence sector. Defence procurement should accordingly adhere to the same principles that guide public sector procurement in non-defence areas: fairness, impartiality, transparency, cost-effectiveness/efficiency, openness to competition. Additionally, it is essential that there be high-level consultation and evaluation of all major procurement projects for all forms of public sector procurement.
The Generic Procurement Process
A generic procurement process involves:
  • A clear definition of the requirement;
  • Clear technical quality specifications and standards;
  • An open request for proposals and tenders;
  • Tender adjudication according to set criteria;
  • Selection of preferred bidder;
  • Drawing up of a contract;
  • Placing the contract/order;
  • Monitoring progress;
  • Reception of goods;
  • Quality assurance checks on goods received;
  • Acceptance of goods or rejection of goods not up to specifications;
  • Payment
  • Distribution of goods.
Source: Len LeRoux, South African defence planning specialist


At the same time, with the exception of procurement of works and commodities (such as construction, clothing, food, fuel, office equipment, general vehicles and consultancy services), defence procurement does exhibit some distinctive characteristics. These relate to: 1) the relative importance of cost in determining which bid is accepted; 2) confidentiality related to national security considerations; 3) time frame for major weapons procurement; 4) complexity of defence procurement; and 5) the existence of international arms control treaty regimes and national legislation governing arms procurement. These distinctive characteristics are deviations in scale rather than principle. As explained above, adequate levels of confidentiality can be maintained without violating basic public expenditure management principles. There certainly should be skepticism about any claims that procurement of relatively standard works, services, and commodities for defence should be subject to different rules.


  • Cost considerations in bidding. While standard procurement practice in non-defence sectors is giving increasing emphasis to value-for-money considerations, defence analysts argue that cost considerations are more frequently not the major factor in accepting a bid for weapons procurement projects than for projects in non-defence sectors. They point out, however, that national legislation can play an important role in regulating the role that cost plays in procurement processes in the defence sector. In South Africa, for example, the Defence Review (www.mil.za/Articles&Papers/Frame/Frame.htm, click on ?Defence Review ?98?) and the White Paper on Defence Related Industries (education.pwv.gov.za/ Legislation/White_Papers/Defence.htm) spell out which technologies are considered ?strategically essential capabilities? and thus exempt from lowest-cost considerations. The South African Parliament has approved both policy documents.
  • Confidentiality. Transparency in defence procurement must be limited by national security interests. Confidentiality clauses will be required in the defence procurement process. This too can be regulated by national legislation. The South African Defence Review lists a number of reasons for confidentiality in defence procurement. These include: the protection of third party commercial information, the national security of South Africa, harm to South Africa?s ability to conduct international relations, and the protection of South Africa?s economic interests and commercial activities of government bodies.
  • Time frame for major weapons procurement. From inception to final acceptance of product, procurement of major weapon systems may take as much as 15 years. Some flexibility needs to be built into the procurement process to take account of contingencies such as fluctuations in currency exchange rates. This long time frame also makes quality control throughout the procurement process essential, rather than when the product is ready for delivery. Defence procurement projects should also take into account full life-cycle support to and cost of the acquired systems. The long time frame also makes it essential to attempt to forecast spending farther into the future than in non-defence sectors. The UK, for example, has a 10-year ?Long Term Costing? system for defence.
  • Complexity of defence procurement. Due to the complexity of defence procurement, sound management of the defence procurement process requires interdisciplinary project teams. Such teams should contain expertise on engineering, resource management, contracting, quality assurance and design assurance. Additionally, because of the complexity of the procurement process for major weapon systems, which involves a substantial number of subcontractors, opportunities for corruption are particularly great. These projects therefore require the highest level of management and scrutiny by governmental accountability mechanisms. South Africa has three levels of approval for major arms acquisition projects within the South African Department of Defence. For major projects, parliamentary approval may also be required.
  • Existence of international arms control treaty regimes and national legislation governing arms procurement. General government procurement is not subject to this sort of international and national legislation. Some defence budgeting specialists suggest that such national and international regulation increases transparency due to associated oversight mechanisms.

22 This discussion draws on information provided by defence planning specialist Len LeRoux and defence management specialist Tony.